Relevant blog links/articles

'Women in the music industry: Chewed up and spat out?'

'The degradation of women in music videos'

'Women's interpretation of music videos'

'13 year old girl: Women wearing very little in music videos is normal- isn't it?'

'Blurred Lines: Why can't women dance provocatively and still be empowered?'

Secondary school questionnaire: Results

I was able to give my questionnaires to a Year 7 class of roughly 16 students. There was a lot of repetition in their answers so I condensed their feedback down into crucial, relevant data that will benefit my investigation. I think this data will add an interesting argument- I was shocked at some of the answers because the young teenagers showed a definite lack of observation in regards to the sexualisation of men and women. The dominant reaction that came across through their answers was indifference. This could represent a de-sensitisation towards moral/sexist issues from the younger generations.

Miley Cyrus We Can't Stop: music video analysis

Questions for secondary school

Draft of questions:

-Who is your favourite music artist and why?

-Do you watch music videos, if so where do you watch them? (YouTube/music channels)

- Have you seen the Blurred Lines music video? What is your opinion of it?

-Have you seen Miley Cyrus’s Wrecking Ball video? What is your opinion of it?

-Have you seen Miley Cyrus's We Can't Stop video? What is your opinion of it?

-Do you think the men and women act the same in these videos? Why do you think this is?

-Write down some differences between the ways the men and women act:

Final questionnaire:

Reading Task

What I will do: 

My aim is to analyse and document secondary research through college library books and online Google books, addressing gender in the media. I will gather relevant quotations and supportive content and link them to the hypothesises within my investigation. I will try to find both supportive and challenging content to create a solid and balanced argument.

How this will benefit my investigation:

This task will help me to revise the essential key concepts of textual analysis, terminology and stereotypical gender roles. Fundamentally, the quotations that I find will be useful to incorporate into my written essay piece because they will support/challenge controversial statements.

Books of study:

• An Introduction to theories of Popular Culture by Dominic Strinati
• Imagining Women, Cultural Representations and Gender by Frances Bonner

Quotation:

‘Women are either absent or represented in terms of stereotypes based upon sexual attractiveness and the performance of domestic labour. In short, women are ‘symbolically annihilated’ by the media through being absent, condemned or trivialised.’ pg. 180
Meaning: 
This reinforces the notion that women are the passive gender and men are the active. This can be applied to Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines music video because there are three male singers, fully clothed, respected and dominant vs three naked women who are presented as sexual objects in the video with no other role than to look attractive and be looked at through the male gaze. This also recognises how women have become triviliased in comparison to men are considered 'beneath', 'below' or 'the other'. 

Quotation:
‘The ‘symbolic annihilation of women’ practiced by the mass media serves to confirm that the roles of the wife, mother and housewife etc. are the fate of women in a patriarchal society.'
Meaning:
Establishes female stereotypical gender roles and occupations which often regard cleaning, cooking and waiting under men (motherly and nurturing roles).This quotation recognises that this is the result of patriarchal societies because there is always a social hierarchy and women are viewed as less important than the other sex. The 'symbolic annihilation of women' refers to how society has accepted this oppressed view of women and, essentially, women's rights to hold power will always be frowned upon and considered irrelevant. 

Quotation:
Van Zoonen: ‘Numerous quantative content analyses have shown that women hardly appear in the mass media, be it depicted as wife, mother, daughter, girlfriend; as working in traditionally female jobs (secretary, nurse, receptionist); or as sex-object… It is thought that media perpetuate sex role stereotypes because they reflect dominant social values and also because male media producers are influenced by these stereotypes.’ 
Meaning:
Reiterates stereotypical/traditional/sexist female occupations which undermine their intellect. Quotation suggests that male producers do this purposely to exemplify male dominance and establish the patriarchy.

Quotation:
'This symbolic annihilation of women is confirmed by the adverts shown on television. Analyses of television commercials support the reflection of this hypothesis. In voice-overs and one-sex (all male or all female) ads, commercials neglect or stereotype women. In their portrayal of women, the ads banish females to the role of house-wife, mother, homemaker, and sex objects, limiting the roles women may play in society.’ pg. 183

Meaning:

Evidence supports the notion that there is a lack of female presence and influence in the media, in particular, in Television. The statistics used are very dated and therefore unreliable to today's media, however these statistics can be used contextually.

Quotation:
'This characterisation of women as body and emotion has been used to place women in connection with the home, the family and our supposedly caring duties.This dualistic thinking has also extended into binaries used in the evaluation of art (such as decorative or functional) which can be added to the basic dichotomies to create evaluations of women being regarded as emotional, sensuous, colourful, ornamental, derivative and decorative.'
Meaning:
The idea of women being 'decorative' and 'ornamental' connotes the message that a woman's only importance is her body image and appearance. This links to the Blurred Lines music video which has been critiqued by many viewers (and feminists) saying that the women have been used to make the video more visually pleasing. Ultimately, the women are used as sexual objects to draw in a male audience.

Questionnaire results

Relevant article research (14/10/13)

What I will do:

My plan is to research relevant articles surrounding the controversy of Robin Thicke's Blurred Line's music video. I aim to gather a range of views and opinions in the hope of creating a balanced argument from the prospective of both male and female. Some articles are strongly feminist and others see no harm or offence in the video/lyrics). I will then summarise the key points of each artcle.

How this will benefit my investigation:

 This task is essential because, to improve my work, I need to validate the controversy within my essay piece by supporting statements through secondary research. I will convert each article into a viewable PDF file and then highlight any information which supports or challenges the hypothesis that men use women as objects within the music industry. I will then incorporate this information into my written essay.



Summary of key points:

• Viewing audience found song sexually suggestive and unsuitable for young children who may view the advert
• Disagreement with how women are positioned: on all fours
• People have accused the lyrics of reinforcing rape myths, 'I know you want it' 'You're a good girl'
• Critics say the lyrics are sexist and degrading to women
• Beats Electronics International argue that the women featured in the ad are 'strong individuals who are not subservient to the male character'
• Argument that the majority of the viewing audience would not find the ad offensive of overt sexual connotation
• The ad was banned from playing before 7:30pm by the Advertising Standards Authority due to the over all tone being sexual

Summary of key points:

• Video caused mass offence, especially from rape victims who strongly believe the lyrics validify acceptance of women objectification and abuse
• Referred to as 'Robin Thicke's new rape song'
• Anger caused by the idea of 'blurred lines' and not giving sexual consent (reenforcing connotations of rape)
• Offence at 'not safe for work', naked models used in the videos. Video was banned from YouTube for obvious nudity
• The unrated version has 50 million views whereas the rated version only has 500,000 views
• Overtly provocative and makes some female listeners uncomfortable
• Connotes the idea that men think that 'no means yes'
• Mentions the Beats Electronic International banned ad and how it gained 30% disapproval on YouTube
• Quotations from Thicke saying he has always respected women (reinforced by infro given about his wife and children)
• He claims he only wanted to have fun in this video

Summary of key points:

• I thought this article was interesting because Miley Cyrus was completely attacked for her performance at the 2013 VMA's, and critics seemed to unjustly disregard Robin Thicke's involvement
• Double standards- men's provocative behaviour acceptable but not women's, 'no one cares about the man'
• Miley claims that Thicke knew exactly how the performance would play out through rehearsals, and yet he denies this in recent interviews by calling her behaviour 'unexpected'
• Makes the women look in the wrong, and the man in the right
• Women's provocative behaviour being more socially unacceptable in comparison to men's

Moving image terminology: recap and revision task

Key terms

Cinema Verite: A candid-camera style of filmmaking using hand-held cameras, natural sound, grainy high-contrast black-and-white film, and the appearance of no rehearsal and only basic editing.

Cinematographer: The person who supervises all aspects of photography from the operation of cameras to lighting.

Mise en scene: The arrangement of visual compositional elements and movements within a given space. In movies, it is defined by the frame that enclosed the images. Cinematic mise en scene encompasses both the staging of the action and the way it's photographed.

Sequence: A structural unit of a film using time, location, or some pattern to link together a number of scenes.

Composition: The placement of people or objects within the frame and the arrangements for actual movements within the frame or by the camera.

Colour Palette: A limited number of specific colours used or emphasised throughout the film to subtly communicate various aspects of character and story to the viewer.

Motifs: Images, patterns, or ideas that are repeated throughout the film and are variations or aspects of the major theme.

Audio 

Ambient Sound: Sounds natural to any film scene’s environment.

Voice-over Narration: The technique of using an off-screen voice to convey necessary background information, fill in gaps in the narrative, and comment on the action.

Diegetic Sound: Sound whose source is visible on screen/implied to be present by the action of the film

Non-diegetic Sound: Sound whose source is neither visible on the screen nor implied to be present in the action

Contrapuntal Sound: A term which refers to sound which does not 'fit' with the scene or image

Camera shot

Dolly Shot: A moving shot taken from a dolly. A Dolly moves the camera toward the subject, while a Dolly-Out moves the camera away from the subject. A dolly shot creates a sense of movement through space by capturing changes in perspective.

Tracking shot: A shot in which the camera is pushed horizontally along the ground on a dolly. 

Pan: A shot in which a stationary camera turns horizontally, revealing new areas.

POV shot: A shot which is understood to be seen from the point of view of a character within the scene.

Transition

Dissolve: A method of making a transition from one shot to another by briefly superimposing one image upon another and then allowing the first image to disappear. A dissolve is a stronger form of transition than a cut and indicates a distinct separation in action. 

Fade: A transitional device in which either an image gradually dims until the viewer sees only a black screen (Fade-Out) or an image slowly emerges from a black screen to a clear and bright picture (Fade-In). A fade provides a strong break in continuity, usually setting off sequences.

Wipe: A transitional device in which one image slowly replaces another by pushing the other out of the way.

Cross-cutting: The alternating of shots from two different sequences, often in different locales, suggesting that they are taking place at the same time.

Jump Cut: An instantaneous cut from one action to another, at first seemingly unrelated, action. Jump cuts will usually call attention to themselves because of the abrupt change in time and/or place.

Match Cut: A cut intended to blend two shots together unobtrusively (opposed to a Jump Cut). Also known as a graphic shot.

Flashback: A segment of film that breaks normal chronological order by shifting directly to time past. Flashback may be subjective (showing the thoughts and memory of a character) or objective (returning to earlier events to show their relationship to the present).

Montage: (dynamic editing, expressive montage, conditional montage) A method of putting shots together in such a way that dissimilar materials are juxtaposed to make a statement. 

Camera Angle

High-Angle Shot: A shot taken from above a subject, creating a sense of "looking down" upon whatever is photographed.

Low-Angle Shot: A shot taken from below a subject, creating a sense of "looking up to" whatever is photographed.

Bird's-eye View: A shot in which the camera photographs a scene from directly overhead.

Reaction Shot: A shot showing one or more characters reacting to an action or statement. 

Zoom Shot: A shot accomplished with a lens capable of smoothly and continuously changing focal lengths from wide-angle to telephoto (zoom in) or telephoto to wide-angle (zoom out).

Revision of Propp's theory

Key concepts revision: Genre, narrative & representation

Questionnaire for music video research (26/09/13)

Research Plan: September/October - November/December

Coursework Essay (18/09/2013)

Explore the representation of gender through the evolution of music videos

My investigation involves looking at how men and women in music videos have been portrayed over the years and how their representations have evolved due to development in society and music culture. I decided to focus my analysis on male artist videos because I found similarities regarding women being treated as ‘props’ and lacking a solid identity.  The videos that I have looked at involve N.E.R.D.’s Lapdance, 50 Cent Ft. Olivia’s Candy Shop and Robin Thick Ft. T.I & Pharrell’s Blurred Lines.  My aim was to find evidence supporting and challenging the hypothesis that gender inequality and overt sexualisation of women is concurrently still an issue in today's society. My investigation entailed of textual analysis, dissecting relevant articles, and a focus group, in which I obtained the views and opinions of both male and female.

The N.E.R.D Lapdance (2001) was the most shocking out of my three chosen videos due to its overtly sexual nature and provocative lyrics. The audience received the video very negatively finding it derogatory and offensive towards women and it was reviewed as ‘borderline pornographic’. The men are introduced riding bicycles towards a tracking camera, with low saturation and hoody’s/hats. These editing effects, clothing codes and props create a threatening and intimidating vibe, which links to the notion that the men are fully in control and taking advantage of an area which is patriarchal. The confrontational language and ‘macho’ facial expressions add to their masculine image which is a traditional stereotype towards the gender. To add dramatic emphasis to the masculine image, Pharrell is always filmed surrounded by women who give them their full attention. This could connate the ideology that woman is a man’s ‘possession’ and that it is their ‘duty’ to please.

The main points which I summarised from this video include how the women can be looked at as objects of sex, dressed as strippers and prostitutes and how they have been used to succumb to male sexual fantasy’s. This is supported by the extreme close up shots of women licking their lips, a classic semiotic of sex, and high camera angles emphasising the female form. Throughout the entire video, the women are looked at through the male gaze which encourages people to sexualise them. This is emphasised by the fact that many of the camera shots are purely of their bodies, with the faces blacked or cropped out; this could create the impression that they are literally only being used for their bodies. My focus group allowed me to obtain both male and female opinions on the video. It was interesting to find out that they all agreed that the N.E.R.D. video was too extreme, offensive to women and that they found the men’s behaviour to be disgusting. They also noted the contrast in clothing codes between the men and women- the men being fully clothed, dominant and respected, and the women being stripped down completely and reduced to objects for being sexualised.

The next video that I analysed was 50 Cent’s Candy Shop which was produced in 2005. Similarly to the Lapdance video, the male is represented as a figure of wealth and power. 50 Cent is introduced riding a sleek, red convertible car which symbolises prosperity and success; immediately he is given a high, respectable status. In contrast, the women are filmed immediately from a low angle, coming down stairs, to accentuate the length of their legs, being looked at through the male gaze and giving people the opportunity to sexualise them. The metaphor of a ‘candy shop’ is used to relate 50 Cents experience at this house full of beautiful women to a child being in a sweet shop, and being surrounded by so many tantalizing treasures. One could also look at the notion of ‘candy representing women’ as objectifying and sexist. The video consists of numerous scenes of different women dressed in different outfits and ‘displayed’ in different situations. The roleplay consists of a nurse/doctor and a dominatrix holding a whip. One could argue the positive representation that the women are expressing sexual empowerment and are represented in a dominant manner, being in complete control. A point that is important to consider is that although the lyrics are sexual, it does not solidify the statement that the women are being ‘used’. This is because a female singer repeats identical lyrics to 50 Cent which could signify how the women are as eager and comfortable as the other gender.

An alternative interpretation of this music video, as opposed to women being treated as sex objects, is that the women are fully in control and take on the more masculine/dominant role. This is shown through the female body language being leading, powerful and in command. A person in my focus group described the women as ‘catering to the needs of the man and being used solely for the purpose of sex’ however the counterargument was that the women ‘remain in control’ and are central the whole time. The overall opinion from my focus group, regarding their reactions to this video, was less shocking in comparison to the Lapdance video. When asked why this was, they stated that the women were more respected, more clothed, and given a more active role.

The Blurred Lines (2013) video has recently caused immense controversy from its receiving audience regarding the discrimination and objectification of women, and the ideology that Robin Thick is consenting rape due to the fact he intends to bed the women even though they are giving him ‘blurred lines’ and not saying yes or no. Feminists have been outraged and many parody videos have been made in criticism to his video; an interesting parody which I came across involved gender reversals in which the women are fully clothed, and the men are stripped down. A strong and popular argument was made through the mimicking of lyrics: ‘This is not liberation; this is objectification, and some degradation, leading to rape justification. There is no ‘blurred line’ in consent’. From my research, it is clear that feminists were outraged by the video; I therefore found it really interesting to obtain the views of a male audience through my focus group. As expected, the females described
Thicke’s behaviour as ‘disgusting’, ‘unacceptable and ‘misogynist’. Contrastingly, the men only had positive reactions to the video, admiring the beauty of the females and finding no offence regarding sexism. This raised an interesting argument: the women stated that the video promoted the sexualisation of females, deeming it as acceptable behaviour. The counter argument was how it can be looked at as the positive free choice for women and sexual liberation.

The introduction of Blurred Lines begins with an extreme close up shot of a man’s legs wrapped around a woman’s bare legs. Not only could this be considered sexual but there is also a possessive element present, linking it to N.E.R.D.’s video. This pose could connote the message that woman belongs to the man which contextually links to Harry Enfield’s ‘Woman, know your place’. There are three males and three females present, of which we connate with sexual fantasies; the men are dressed in presentable black suits which are semiotics of power, dominance and respectability. Dissimilarly, the women are completely stripped down and are shown to make much more of an effort through dancing in comparison to the males. Through the use of props, such as a lamb and hay stacks, an extreme and negative representation becomes apparent placing women on the same level as animals. An alternative interpretation could be how these animalistic traits can be focused on the male characters, placing them in the category of being instinctive, possessive, and having old fashioned values of masculinity.

An interesting factor to note about the 2001 and 2013 music videos is that they both feature Pharrell Williams. In Lapdance, he is represented quite negatively by treating the women in a shockingly derogatory manner, acting sleazy and taking advantage of a derelict area with strippers and prostitutes. His clothing codes create an intimidating and threatening visage and these representations contrast to his much more respected appearance in Blurred Lines. He upholds a sense of decency, superiority and male dominance through his clothing and body language. An argument could be made that both male and female behaviour challenges the ethics that one would hope today's day and age would uphold. From the research that I’ve done, I’ve reached the conclusion that the women and men in music videos are represented as binary opposites. The men- respectable, reputable and highly regarded. The women- seductresses who lure men into dark, secret places of temptation. The women personify the act of sexualisation and seem to cater to the men’s sexual desires. They are not given any identity and have to work harder to gain attention- often through being explicitly dressed. On the other hand, the male representation can be looked at as acting derogatory towards females, and encouraging misogynist behaviour.

An argument could be made that these representations challenge the ethics of chivalry- due to this behaviour becoming ‘the norm’, it makes sexist and inequality values seem socially acceptable, when in reality, not only it is categorized as offensive and critical, but it is a misrepresentation of male and female characteristics. Most women do not ‘lure’ men into dark rooms, tempting and seducing them, and many men are not completely sex driven and misogynic. Vladimir Propp, a Russian scholar, created the theory of ‘stock characters’ whereby he recognized how certain narrative elements, such as basic problems and the types of characters, constantly recur through different texts. He focused on the way these characters seemed to be ‘types’ rather than individuals and this is evident in the three music videos which I have looked at. The men are always either the ‘hero’ or ‘helper’ who go on a quest in search of something (in this case, women and sex). The women fit the ‘damsel in distress’ type role, needing to be ‘liberated’, and apparently craving escapism from their abysmal lives. They could also be considered the ‘reward’ because ultimately, the ideology within the videos is that sexual intercourse is inevitable, thus, further supporting the negative belief that women are merely objects to be used.

“The determining male gaze projects its fantasy onto the female figure”. Women are put in a position of being displayed, looked at. They are always displayed as an erotic, sexual appealing object in the cinema. It becomes an unfailing law in any mainstream cinema.” – Laura Mulvey from ’Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’. This act of voyeurism is very much present within Lapdance and Candy Shop and this could make the atmosphere appear quite dirty and underhanded. It’s possible that the producers encode the messages that women will go to any lengths to make men happy, and that sex is an imperative and necessary part of being human which we should accept and embrace. However on the contrary, an audience could decode these messages as women being degraded, offensively sexualised and being placed below men in terms of equality.

The research that I have undergone has led me to the conclusion that the inequality and sexualisation of genders in music videos are still very much an issue in today’s media. Even in the 90’s, rappers would use women as sexualised objects within their lyrics, and as years have passed, women remain treated with an air of inequality. Unfortunately, it appears that the only difference now is that videos, such as Blurred Lines, create the false pretence that sexist treatments of women are now tolerable and acceptable.

Focus Group (13/09/13)

Points of discussion:

1) What are your first impressions of the music videos? 
2) Are there any similarities between the videos that I have shown you?
3) Are there any differences between the videos that I have shown you?
4) In your opinion, how have the men and women been represented in these videos? 
5) Has this representation changed over the years?
6) Would you say that the men and women have been portrayed in a positive or negative light? 

Focus group: 13/09/13

Duration: 20 minutes

Location: My house

I asked four people (Maddie 21, Sam 20,  Jen 19 and Chris 19) to take part in a 20 minute discussion regarding my investigation which looks into the representation of gender in music videos. I have chosen to focus on videos of male artists who use women as background characters/dancers. This is because I found it interesting how their portrayal of men and women, women in particular, has evolved over the years. The music videos that I am analysing include Lapdance by N.E.R.D. (2001), Candy Shop by 50 Cent Ft. Olivia (2005) and Blurred Lines by Robin Thick Ft T.I & Pharrell (2013). I ranged the videos between 2001-2013 so that I will be able to discuss the development of gender construction as an evolution. I took my focus group to a quiet room and played the three 2-3 minute music videos to them; I then asked a series of relevant questions which I hope will aid my investigation research. Additionally, I chose to ask the opinions of two females and two males to produce a balanced argument and a range of judgements.

Interviewer (Me): What are your first impressions of the music videos?

Maddie: N.E.R.D.'s video was horrific. I haven't heard the song or seen the video before and I'm really shocked at how sleezy it is. My first thought was 'is this a strip club?' I think Pharrell and the other guys are acting disgusting...so sleezy. The lyrics are as dumb as the video and the women are just lying around not really doing much. The Candy Shop video looked really old, like their outfits are old fashioned and the CGI car at the beginning looks really fake. The women are all catering to 50 Cent's needs and it is very degrading how their jobs are to sell themselves. The Blurred Lines video is the worst. The worst thing about it is how Robin Thick is completely treating the women like objects, and I find it disgusting. Was it really necessary for the producers to strip the women down completely?

Sam: My first impression of the N.E.R.D.'s video is 'wow'. Very explicit. The girls look like prostitutes. And the guys are lapping it up. Not a fan of the video, but catchy tune though. The 50 Cent song is a classic, and to be honest, I'm not surprised at the video because it's expected from the lyrics. I don't think it's as sleezy as the Lapdance video because there aren't as many men exploiting the women. And they are in some sort of mansion, whereas Lapdance is in some dark room... Love the Blurred Lines video, the women are extremely attractive. Great song, great video.

Jen: I really hated all the video's if I'm honest. The N.E.R.D video was really offensive because the women are so completely and utterly sexualised. The men are so disgusting in that video too. The lyrics are rubbish, total rubbish. The 50 Cent video also made the women look like their purpose was just sex. It wasn't as bad as Pharrell's video though... The blurred Lines video makes the sexualisation of women seem acceptable. I've heard so many people say they love the song and they love the video. I suppose, from a male point of view, I can understand.

Chris: I have to admit, I was quite shocked at the Lapdance video, purely because it was so explicit. You would expect girls to be in a video like that, but it was too slutty. The 50 Cent video maps out a pretty common male fantasy. The Blurred Lines video is full of beautiful, topless women, dancing to a great and catchy tune...what's not to love?

 

Interviewer (Me): Are there any similarities between the videos that I have shown you?

Chris: They all have lots of hot girls in and they've all been popular songs which have been critiqued for controversy due to their videos.

Maddie: The lyrics are all abit degrading to women. They all centre around sex, and women's purpose being to please men.

Jen: The men are always fully clothed and the women next to naked.

Sam: To an extent, they could all be considered sexist and offensive to women..

Interviewer (Me): Are there any differences between the videos that I have shown you?

Sam: The first video (N.E.R.D.) seems alot more trashy than the Blurred Lines video. Both have naked women in but for some reason, it is less shocking and more enjoyable through Robin Thick's video...

Chris: I agree with Sam in the sense that it's almost become acceptable for women to act in a degrading way and men to treat women a certain way. In Blurred Lines he refers to the women as animals and yet, overall, it is still less shocking than the Lapdance video.

Maddie: Regarding camera techniques and lighting, the first two videos (Lapdance and Candy Shop) have very dark lighting which makes it seem dirty, secretive and more private. In contrast, the Blurred Lines video is really bright, with happy colours.

Jen: I think there are more similarities than differences. But I agree with what everyone has said, especially with how the lighting has changed which could represent how their behaviour is more acceptable in our society.

Interviewer (Me): In your opinion, how have the men and women been represented in these videos?

Jen: The men are shown as in control, wealthy, dominant and sleezy. The women are treated like objects and they are more background-central and passive rather than in the limelight.

Chris: In the Blurred Lines video, the men were all wearing sharp, smart suits whereas the women were topless and very revealing. So I think the men are made to look more respectable.

Maddie: The women are represented in a completely sexualised way- quite often dressed like strippers. The men at the beginning looked quite intimidating on their bikes, 50 Cent looked very rich and Robin Thick looked smart in a suit.

Sam: The men wear clothes and the women do not.

Interviewer (Me): Has this representation changed over the years?

All four people agreed that in the N.E.R.D. video (2001) was more 'trashy', 'revealing', and 'shockingly explicit' and that the most recent Robin Thick video (2013) was more 'socially accepted'. When I asked why this was, they said that they are used to seeing women in the media represented in this light. However, men are still objectifying and women are still objectified.

Interviewer (Me): Would you say that the men and women have been portrayed in a positive or negative light? 

Chris: The men are shown in a positive light because they have lots of money, nice clothes, gold chains, expensive suits etc. It makes them seem powerful and authoritative. I wouldn't say that the women are shown negatively, just not as respected as the men. 

Jen: I would say that the women are shown in a negative light because they are made out to be completely sex-driven. They are not given any personalities, just made to dance and lie around in the background. I agree that the men look respected and dominant.

Maddie: The men are portrayed positively and the women negatively because of sexism and the idea that women are only good for one thing.

Sam: Both could be seen as negative- The women are being treated like objects and the men are acting sleezy.

Interviewer (Me): Thank you so much for your time, everyone. I've found your comments very useful and beneficial towards my investigation task.

Analysis of male artist music videos

N.E.R.D. - Lapdance 2001

Summary of key points taken from the Lapdance by N.E.R.D. music video:

• Women represented as strippers/prostitutes/sex objects
• Men represented as in control, dominant and intimidating 
• Contrasting clothing codes between genders- men fully dressed, women undressed
• Women being used to create male sexual fantasy's 

50 Cent, Candy Shop, 2005:

Summary of key points taken from the Candy Shop music video (50 Cent Ft. Olivia):

• Completely contrasting gender representations, women are made to work harder to gain attention
• The central metaphor being 'candy shop', there are so many women the male cannot decide what he wants. They are they for the purpose of pleasing men
• Women being in control of their sexuality, they are portrayed as dominant
• The women being used for entertainment value towards the male audience

Robin Thick Ft. Pharrell & T.I- Blurred Lines (Unrated version) 2013

Summary of key points taken from Blurred Lines music video (Robin Thick Ft T.I & Pharrell):

• Beautiful women being treated as objects could make young girls aspire to be treated in a sexualised manner
• Clear, sexist difference between the clothing codes of men and women
• Women being used for entertainment value
• Positive portrayal of women being sexualised